These are questions from SCAD's course units asked about the review:
​What was the single most important factor in the success of your presentation?

In all honesty I have to say that without the direction to research literature that Professor Gilbert gave me I might not be on the left side of the questions. According to the review documentation I was excellent in the areas of "Relationship to career", "Concept Application", "Implementation", and "Direction".  The only area I was below "Good" was an "Average" in "Presentation", in the comments it was clear that this was a typography issue.  While I don't typically like excuses for lacking in an area, I have never taken a typography class, so my knowledge in that area is weak; no excuse, but I have been working on other areas that are more closely related to my current role. 

What other factor(s) do you feel were strengths that gained positive responses from the review committee?

I have to imagine my work examples end product gained points.  My research, organization and execution was pointed out as "Great- a pleasure to view"

Did any specific feedback from earlier peer reviews help you refine your presentation? If so, what specifically?

Sure, people were very unclear about my topic at first.  Through many iterations I was able to get an understandable response from peer review.

Did you receive any positive comments from the review committee with regard to the balance of your visual and written thesis development? If so, what specifically?

I was actually suggested to try to make the connection stronger between the two, so I will be looking to do that.

I am currently helping to develop curriculum at Purdue University and I have brought up an  issue at almost every department meeting we have, here are the issues: 1) students do not know how to create, or what should go in a portfolio (most don't anyway). 2) even if students did know what to do with their portfolio, they are not required to make one till the end of the 4 years at Purdue!  So lets think about this for a second; the goal of going to school is to get an education so that the student can have the skills to work in an area of interest, right?  So instead of an early introduction of the concepts essential for building a portfolio, would we rather wait till the end of year 4?  Do we then send them to confidence crushing career doom when they lack sufficient focus and content?  Since I have been at Purdue I can not tell you how many portfolio reviews I have done where there is no focus, and really no work to show.  

So here is my rough proposal: A one week workshop at the beginning of the 4 year bachelors degree.  1 to 2 hours each night.  Required for ALL students (if they don't show they don't enter the program).  During the 1 to 2 hour lectures all professors from each discipline present information about who they are, what they teach, how it pertains to industry (jobs in that field), and what a professional portfolio for that field currently looks like.  Then on the last day, Friday the students have to create a website on Weebly or something similar.  The students have to hand in assignments through normal measures, and all assignments must be presented on their website in a page named after the class they are in and in a process book format (with specific requirements laid out by the professor).   
Here is the benefit of revising our methods and following this newly proposed model:
1) Students will know what is expected of them in order to compete in the field, from day one.
2) Students will know and understand a number of different disciplines that are possible avenues for career pursuits.
3) Students will know their teachers!  
4) Students will have a portfolio already being built through their coursework by the end of 4 years. At which time all they need to do is refine, remove and/or add to what they have, rather than wasting time trying to organize all of their past works.   
5) Students can hand in an assignment via URL where appropriate.
6)Professors will be able to review ALL of a students work and make assessments regarding students strengths and weaknesses, allowing for better guidance.  
6) Students will be set up to succeed
7) Professors look good and get warm fuzzy feelings when their students succeed.

Researching the Minimalistic Architectural style that my thesis focuses on I found a name that came up often: Tadao Ando. Tadao Ando is so inspirational to me in so many ways; 1) He was a boxer, I studied boxing as well.  I know this may be silly and child like to be enthusiastic about this, but that's just me 2) He never formally studied Architecture, he is self taught.  How many self taught experts in any field end up winning what is considered the highest honor in Architecture, the Pritzker Architecture Prize in 1995? 3) He is the creator of the Japanese structure Church of Light, which I have seen and admired a number of times, but didn't know of the Architect.  This guy is something else!  When he won the $100,000 prize for the Pritzker, he gave all the money to help children in Japan after one of their large earthquakes.  Needless to say, I want to be this kind of visionary and contributor to society and my field.

I was recently asked by a fellow student how I would be adding to the game industry with my thesis, this was my response:

​Imagine you are student with exceptional technical abilities, intelligence and great ideas, but you don't have the visual savvy to show off what you can do in a way that gets you noticed. As artists we may overlook this aspect because we are already good at something that is evident the moment someone sees it.  The old adage "a picture is worth a thousand words" would apply here.  For a designer or programmer who is trying to get noticed it is not so easy, but with the right tools and approach the next genius designer might get a gig because he caught someone's eye with the visuals of his portfolio.  The visuals being stronger equates to time, more time spent by a prospective employer viewing their work.  If I can teach an approach to creating environments that is simple enough for the non-artist to create, yet builds their confidence and abilities, I maybe creating a path for the next great designer/programmer to get a job that will pay them to explore and share their God given talent.  I think that might add to the game industry.

Albert Bandura is considered the 4th most important Psychologist in the history of its practice. His influence is far and wide. In my opinion the most important discovery Albert made was to help people to overcome their fears in order to live a fuller life.  His techniques of building "Self Efficacy" or perception that a task can be accomplished in people can not be overlooked.  Using these effective techniques I believe we can empower people to push through their hangups and mistakes into the realm of accomplishment.  

I just recently learned about David Kelley and the Ideo (or "D" school) at Stanford University, and I am blown away by how much the work he is doing parallels the work I am developing within interactive design media and games.  I had postulated that everyone can build virtual environments because just about everyone has (at least when they were children: Blocks, sand castles forts etc.). After beginning David's book "Creative Confidence: Unleashing the Creative Potential Within Us All" I found that I am not the first to think in this fashion.  David uses the same concept to build a premise that all people are creative and that belief of this is critical to unlocking that inner creativity that has always been there.  After belief is there some simple steps, exercises if you will, allows one to start building on and unlocking their creativity.  I now have a very strong basis to garnish from. Thanks Professor Gilbert for pointing me towards him!

Architect, Daniel Piechota and Designer/Developer, Loring Sagan head this firm found in San Francisco.  Their work is elegant, clean, and makes an effort to work with the environment, it also fits into the model I am using to empower non artists to create art.  Look below at some of the designs and one thing stands out, simple geometric forms made with fine materials.  Much like the minimalist of the 1960's less shows essence. 

I just recently picked up Houdini from SideFX.  I feel very fortunate to have jumped into using Houdini now in version 16, as the good folks at SideFX have made it a point to start competing in a broader market. The tools that are being offered in the newest Houdini are good enough to start to attract a traditional modeler, but it is the Houdini Engine that has become of particular interest to me.  The Houdini Engine is a tool that lets you create procedural pieces for game engines and other DCC apps, so that pieces created in Houdini can be changed interactively within the engine or app.  This kind of workflow will allow artists and designers to highly modify and iterate freely in less time: https://www.sidefx.com/products/houdini-engine/

As an educator I have chosen to be "software agnostic". I put it into quotes because the truth is, while I am willing to use any software to get the job done, I will fully admit that I do have my favorite software. I have professionally used 4 major 3D authoring tools, 2 3D sculpting tools, 7 game engines (many proprietary), and 5 2D texturing packages. More and more  I have come to be inspired by the capabilities of real time graphics.  At one point in my career I was in favor of using traditional render technology over real time because I was unable to achieve the visual fidelity I wanted in my work using game engines.  But I am pleased that I now I no longer feel like game graphics are way behind film.  It has become more and more evident that real time technology is the wave of the future, and I would go as far to say real time technology is the future of film too. That being said I would tip my proverbial hat to Epic and Unreal Engine.  Epic has been pushing the capabilities of their engine for as long as I have been using 3D (since 2002).  Below are some inspiring minimalistic environments rendered in Unreal 4.